Neural Data Rights project
Back to the main Open Thought Space
Contact m@melanieswan.com
Outline
- Introduction and Aim
- Concept Definition and Topics
- Precedents
- Different Potential Approaches
- Practicalities and Technicalities
- Biggest Potential Fears
- Biggest Potential Benefits
- Project Structure
- Other
Introduction and Aim
An increasing number of new personalized data streams are being generated through quantified self-tracking devices, biosensors, wireless Internet-of-things devices, health social network data, and social media data. Rapidly advancing could be continuous health informatics climates including streaming data from consumer EEGs and other brain and emotion measuring devices. The aim of the Neuro Data Rights project is to investigate and set the tone for how issues regarding these new personal data streams can be problematicized to support and facilitate humanity's future directions in a mature, comfortable, and empowering way.
Concept Definition and Topics
- Data streams: Personal neuro data streams (consumer EEG, fMRI, PPG), personal eye-tracking data, biometric data streams from objective metric sensor devices, social media data streams
- Changing definitions of personal and personal data
- Extended self and exosenses (through mobile phone, smartwatch, augmented reality glasses (e.g.; Google Glass project & expected knock-offs, wearable electronics, biosensors)
- Neuro data: quantified self, neuroethics, neurodiversity, neuroexpression, neurocommunications
- Data related issues:
- Standards and formats
- Transmission, sharing, permissioning
- Privacy and security
- Ownership and storage
- Access, economics, business models
- Should there be a difference in the treatment of pure neurobiophysical response data (e.g.; affect) and human-labeled response data (e.g.; emotion)? (link discussing separation of affect and emotion)
Precedents
- Primer of other personal data security/privacy models
- Genomic data, Medical data, Census data, Financial data
- Law - confidential information to privileged information
- Personal - identity management and masks
- Different responses of different countries or groups (including selective adoption, limited adoption, evaluation-based adoption)
Different Potential Approaches
- Rights/responsibilities model
- Access versus ownership model
- What are the Key Questions to Address?
- How should I think about what my neuro privacy rights should be?
Practicalities and Technicalities
- Current State of Technology
- Practical Impact
- Help manage the biggest potential risks and fears (see below)
- Destigmatize pathologies (as has been the case with personal genomic data)
- Speed enhancement, normalization programs
Biggest Potential Risks / Fears
- Near term (the present)
- Security
- Privacy - Some people will know what I am thinking some of the time, and use it against me
- My wife will know what I am thinking. Oh wait, she already does.
- Embarrassment or blackmail
- Identity
- Mid-term (5-10 years from now)
- Privacy
- Government surveillance
- Employer surveillance
- Family/friends
- Unwanted ads, brain spam,
- Security
- Viruses, snow crashes, etc.
- "Memetic attacks" - Maybe fearing thought control is irrational, but fearing thought "nudges" is not...
- Identity
- Long-term (15-25 years from now)
- Privacy
- Security
- Thought control (regardless of whether this is a rational fear)
- "Brain hacks" to extract information
- Identity
- Loss of individuality as it becomes possible to share with the swarm
- Loss of certainty about individual memories, personal narrative
Biggest Potential Benefits
- Improved communication (convenience up, bandwidth up, distribution up).
- "silent messaging".
- Invisible interaction with content - no more interrupting a conversation to look at your phone. You can check the time/weather/whatever without breaking eye contact
- Improved processing (speed up, throughput up, reliability up)
- Improved memory (capacity up, read / write rate up, reliability up). E.g. "Perfect memory".
- It sounds irresistibly fun!
- I will know what my wife is thinking
- Richer interaction through shared emotion or sensation
- Shared thoughtspace
Ideas to Minimize Risks and Maximize Benefits
- Personal Faraday cages required given the potential rapid progress of electromagnetic spectrum detection and lack of social maturity regarding thought-sharing. "Faraday Fashion" anyone?
- Appropriate laws, appropriate punishments
- Adequate enforcement
- Challenge - How to allow law enforcement and regulatory bodies ability to do their jobs without violating privacy. Even bigger challenge than today.
- Principles based, not rules based, so to provide flexibility for fast-changing technology
- Thoughtfully-designed BCI protocols with appropriate security. Asynchronous, layered privacy
- Brain integrity (control over access to one's own emotions, ideas...)
- Body integrity (control over one's physical functions - robotic prosthetics, implanted medical devices...)
- Pre-emptively educating the mass public, in accessible formats. Viral videos, social networks, novels, children's books, lecture circuit, movies. How to give neuro data rights its "15 minutes of fame"? What's the stickiest message?
- Pre-emptive patents for brain security, that are part of a not-for-profit organization. Make it easy to add patents here. Encourage companies to join this organization. (Let's not try to change the patent system here, but instead exploit its rules for the benefit of society.)
- Open-source or reference-design software implementing secure protocols, perhaps with backing of big companies. (A la Apache). Maybe reference design hardware too (A la Google Nexus.)
Project Structure
- Phase I
- Article structuring and discussing the relevant issues, collaboration: Greg McMullen, Melanie Swan
- Sample outline proposals - 10/31/12
- Text complete - 12/31/12
- Front page project endorsement quotes from thought-leaders
- Cory Doctorow (Greg)
- EFF: Dave, Li Tien (Greg); Brad Templeton (Melanie)
- Vernor Vinge
- Phase II
- Book anthology, Greg McMullen, Melanie Swan, editors. Curated essay collection from topical thought-leaders. Potential contributors: Cory Doctorow, Charles Stross, Stu Card, Trent McConaghy, Bruce Schneier, William Gibson, Ramez Naam,
- IEEE Standards Working Group (Part of the 802 category?)
- Conference
- Meetup groups
- Policy fellowship
Resources